Contact Us
Understanding the Differences Between Optical Transceivers: 100G QSFP28 vs. SFP112
Resources

Understanding the Differences Between Optical Transceivers: 100G QSFP28 vs. SFP112


In high-density data centers, enterprise networks, and telecom infrastructures, fiber optic transceivers are critical for enabling ultra-fast data transmission. Among the popular choices, 100G QSFP28 and SFP112 transceivers cater to different performance and scalability requirements. While QSFP28 is a proven standard delivering 100 Gbps through four 25 Gbps lanes, SFP112 pushes the envelope with potential speeds up to 112 Gbps, albeit with some standardization challenges.


Overview

100G QSFP28

This transceiver is a compact, hot-pluggable device designed for high-speed data transmission. By aggregating four lanes of 25 Gbps, it delivers a total throughput of 100 Gbps, making it a staple in modern data center architectures, high-performance computing environments, and telecommunications networks. Its broad industry support and compatibility have cemented its role as the go-to solution for many applications.


SFP112
Developed under the SFP-DD MSA, SFP112 is an evolution of the traditional SFP+ form factor. Its design supports 100 Gb/s PAM4 transmission (up to 56 GBd), offering a theoretical boost in data rate—up to 112 Gbps. The transceiver supports multiple connector and cage designs, and it maintains backward compatibility with both SFP28 and SFP+ devices. However, because its specifications can differ between vendors, some challenges with compatibility and interoperability may arise.


Comparative Analysis

Factor100G QSFP28SFP112
Data RateStandardized 100 Gbps (4×25 Gbps lanes)Up to 112 Gbps (e.g., 4×28 Gbps or single-channel)
Port DensityHigh—ideal for dense switch environmentsModerate—smaller footprint but with potential thermal challenges
Transmission DistanceMultiple options (SR, LR, ER, etc.)May offer longer reach with advanced modulation
Power ConsumptionTypically ≤3.5W for efficient operationHigher power demands necessitating enhanced cooling
Connector CompatibilityWidely supports SR4, LR4, and DAC connectionsVaries by manufacturer, which might affect integration
Market AdoptionMature, well-established, cost-effectiveEarly-stage; higher initial pricing with expected reductions over time
Use CasesData centers, enterprise networks, HPCEmerging applications such as AI analytics, edge computing, and specific SFP+ upgrades


Decision Factors for Transceiver Selection

Bandwidth and Performance:


  • QSFP28: Offers a stable 100 Gbps throughput, ideal for environments with predictable high-speed requirements.

  • SFP112: Provides an edge with a theoretical 112 Gbps, suitable for cutting-edge applications that demand extra bandwidth, such as real-time analytics and next-generation storage systems.


Compatibility and Ecosystem:


  • QSFP28: Its industry-standard design ensures broad compatibility with switches, routers, and network interface cards (NICs).

  • SFP112: Although backward compatible with existing SFP28/SFP+ systems, its variability across vendors might require more careful hardware matching.


Port Density and Physical Footprint:


  • QSFP28: The quad-channel design allows for a high density of ports, which is critical for space-constrained data centers.

  • SFP112: Its design minimizes physical size and may enable a higher port count on front panels, but the increased data rate can lead to greater heat generation, necessitating robust cooling solutions.


Cost Considerations:


  • QSFP28: Benefits from economies of scale, offering a more affordable solution in mature markets.

  • SFP112: While initial costs might be higher due to limited adoption, prices are expected to decline as the technology becomes more standardized and widely adopted.


Future-Proofing:


  • QSFP28: Remains the backbone of current high-speed networks, though its scalability may be tested as future bandwidth demands increase.

  • SFP112: Geared toward future applications with demands exceeding 100 Gbps, provided that ongoing standardization efforts keep pace with technological advancements.


Conclusion

Choosing between 100G QSFP28 and SFP112 depends on your specific network needs. QSFP28 stands out for its proven reliability, widespread adoption, and cost efficiency, making it ideal for today’s data centers and enterprise networks. In contrast, SFP112 offers the promise of higher speeds and is positioned to support next-generation applications, albeit with some potential hurdles regarding compatibility and thermal management.

For organizations prioritizing a well-established solution with broad industry support, QSFP28 is a safe and effective choice. Meanwhile, those looking to future-proof their networks and address emerging high-bandwidth applications may find the enhanced capabilities of SFP112 to be worth the initial investment, provided that they account for the associated challenges.

In either case, partnering with a vendor like T&S that delivers robust, rigorously tested fiber optic transceivers—complemented by advanced adaptation technologies—will ensure your network remains efficient, scalable, and ready for future demands.

 


PREV: Unlocking PAM4 Modulation NEXT: No information
Latest News & Blog
Recommended Products
We use cookies to offer you a better browsing experience, analyze site traffic and personalize content. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy Policy
Reject Accept